In the framework of Protomedea and Marisca projects, a study aiming to map and categorize Fisheries Restricted Areas (FRAs) in the Aegean Sea was conducted. Results of the study were published in Mediterranean Marine Science. FRAs were identified through the analysis of national legislation on fisheries, environmental protection, preservation of underwater archaeological sites and maritime activities, implying different types of spatial-temporal restrictions of fishing activities. Moreover, spatial-temporal restrictions established by the EU and the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) were also reviewed. Collected information was organised in a database, including both spatial and non-spatial information on the identified FRAs.
Questions this practice may help answer
- How Fisheries Restricted Areas (FRAs) can be identified and categorised?
- Which FRAs have been implemented so far in the Aegean Sea?
- For what purposes and through which national or international legal instruments have these FRAs been established?
Implementation Context
Fisheries Restricted Areas (FRAs) are geographically-defined areas in which all or certain fishing activities are temporally or permanently banned or restricted, in order to improve the conservation and sustainable exploitation of living aquatic resources and the protection of marine ecosystems. This practice is extracted from a study whose results have been published in the Mediterranean Marine Science journal, focusing on FRAs in place in the Aegean Sea (Greece), taking into account their spatial allocation and specific characteristics (type of restrictions, legal instruments to support their regulation and management framework). The study results contributed to the projects: (i) “PROTOMEDEA - Towards the establishment of marine protected area networks in the Eastern Mediterranean”, and (ii) “MARISCA – Maritime spatial planning for the protection and conservation of the biodiversity in the Aegean sea”.
Aspects / Objectives
The overall objective of this study was to identify and map the current distribution of spatial-temporal restrictions of fishing activities in the Aegean Sea (Greece), and to provide science-based documentation for fisheries policy research, decision making, as well as monitoring, control and enforcement. In addition, the national fisheries legal framework concerning these restrictions was critically examined, and its weaknesses were identified and discussed.
Method
The study focuses on the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Geographic Sub-Areas (GSAs) “22-Aegean Sea” and “23-Crete” as well as on a part (2,336 km2) of GSA “24-North Levantine”. Both Greek territorial and international waters are included in the study area.
Identification of nationally established FRAs (nFRAs) was performed through a systematic review of the national fisheries legal framework concerning spatial-temporal restrictions of fishing activities in territorial and international waters. Greek national legislations imposing fishery restrictions were also analysed in relation to designated archaeological sites, areas for nature protection (MPAs) and areas with special regulation under maritime legislation (i.e. ports, beaches, underwater cable/pipe areas, etc.). The FRAs established by the European Union (eu-FRAs) were identified by reviewing EU fisheries legislation. Identification of the FRAs established by international fisheries organizations (intFRAs) and specifically by the Regional Fisheries Management Organization (RFMO) GFCM was based on the information provided by the Compendium of Decisions of the GFCM (GFCM Decision Compendium, 2016). Only provisions in force (as determined by competent authorities) were included in the analysis.
A database of identified FRAs was then created in Excel, containing detailed information for each area. FRAs were classified according to:
- Typology related to their legal status: national fisheries legislation FRAs in territorial waters (nftFRAs), national fisheries legislation FRAs in international waters (nifFRAs), national environmental legislation FRAs related to MPAs (neFRAs), national archaeological legislation FRAs (naFRAs), national maritime legislation FRAs (nmFRAs), European Union legislation FRAs (euFRAs), international organizations’ decisions FRAs (intFRAs);
- Marine area, according to the National Statistical Service of Greece (NSSG);
- Geographic region, according to the official EC nomenclature of terrestrial units (NUTS) for statistics;
- GFCM geographic sub-region;
- Restricted gear type: towed, mobile, static or their combinations;
- Main purpose of spatial-temporal restriction: stock protection, nature reserve area, archaeological protection, etc.;
- Closure type: permanent or seasonal.
The spatial information for each FRA was structured in a GIS. Polygons in shapefile format for each FRA were created using the information obtained from the relevant legal acts. Insufficient information on FRAs delimitation was supplemented from other sources, as: contribution of the competent authorities, grey literature, supplementary material (e.g. navigation maps or travel maps, etc.).
Main Outputs / Results
A wide legal framework concerning the establishment of spatial-temporal restrictions of fishing activities for various purposes was collected and analysed in the study area:
- national fisheries legal framework: 32 legal acts, namely 3 Ministerial Decisions (MDs), 10 Royal Decrees (RDs) and 19 Presidential Decrees (PDs);
- national environmental legal framework: 2 legal acts, namely 1 Joint Ministerial Decision (JMD) and 1 PD;
- national legal framework for the protection of underwater archaeological heritage: 37 legal acts, namely 6 JMDs and 31 MDs;
- national maritime legislation: 43 legal acts, all MDs;
- the EU and GFCM legal framework: one EU Regulation (EU Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006) and one GFCM Recommendation (GFCM Recommendation 29/2005/1), respectively.
The review of the spatial-temporal restrictions of fishing activities in the study area, revealed a total of 521 FRAs: 511 nFRAs (253 nfFRAs, 1 nifFRA, 21 neFRAs, 85 naFRAs and 151 nmFRAs), 6 euFRAs and 4 intFRAs. For each FRA, a wealth of detailed information was compiled and summarized in a table. 516 out of the 521 identified FRAs were mapped as polygons in shapefile format; due to lack of accurate spatial information it was not possible to map remaining 5 FRAs.


The analysis of collected information showed that:
- 85.2% of the 521 identified FRAs are located in the Aegean Sea and 14.8% in Crete marine area;
- In most of these FRAs (88.5%) the use of towed or mobile gears is restricted, while the use of static gears and recreational fishing activity are only restricted respectively in 10.2% and 1.3% of the analysed FRAs;
- Protection of fish stock and preservation of Posidonia oceanicameadows are the most common purposes determining restricting of fishing activities (25.3% and 25.0%, respectively);
- Most of the identified FRAs (85.4%) impose permanent closures.
Following remarks are discussed in the paper on FRAs in the Aegean Sea:
- The national legal framework about spatial and temporal restrictions on fishing activities in the Aegean Sea is remarkably complex. On the contrary, the European and international legal frameworks appear clear and well-defined.
- The national restrictions on fishing activities issued by virtue of fisheries legislation (i.e. nfFRAs), are established typically as conventional fishery management measures, e.g. in order to limit the harvest of specific life stages, to protect depleted stocks and their habitats during the rebuilding phase of a fishery, to protect genetic reservoirs, to protect habitat that is critical for the sustainability of harvested resources or to restrain excess fleet capacity and optimize the value of catches.
- The restrictions on fishing activities within the nationally designated MPAs according to the environmental legal framework (neFRAs) are imposed as wider conservation measures, to improve conservation of natural habitats.
- National maritime (see nmFRAs) and archaeology (see naFRAs) legislation establishing measures to regulate maritime activities and to protect underwater archaeological heritage, although not directly related to the fishery management, also contribute to some degree to the protection of fisheries resources and the conservation of the marine environment.
- Spatial and temporal closures established at European and international level in the study are issued as wider conservation measures rather than conventional fisheries management measures, as they are established not only to improve the sustainable management of fisheries resources, but also to protection demersal and deep-water habitats and species.
Transferability
The methodology used to categorize the different FRAs typology according to a number of attributes can be transferred to other marine areas. The database created through this study can be further expanded with new information and can contribute to populating databases covering a larger scale (e.g. the entire Mediterranean basin scale).
The study represents a contribution to the Greek national evaluation of the effectiveness of spatial-temporal restrictions in the Aegean Sea necessary to support the framework of the Common Fisheries Policy, and for an efficient management of marine space, in accordance with the principles of Maritime Spatial Planning and adaptive management.
Contact Person
Dimitra Petza
Department of Marine Sciences, University of the Aegean
E-mail: d.petzamarine.aegean.gr
Responsible Entity
Department of Marine Sciences, University of the Aegean
Costs / Funding Source
The study is a contribution to the Research Projects “PROTOMEDEA- Towards the establishment of Marine Protected Area Networks in the Eastern Mediterranean”, supported by DG for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the European Commission, under Grant Agreement SI2.721917 and “MARISCA -ΜΑRItime Spatial planning for the protection and Conservation of the biodiversity in the Aegean sea”, co-funded by the European Environmental Area Financial Mechanism, (EEA FM 2009-2014) and the Public Investments Program (PIP).
Direct costs of this practice elaboration are unknown.